Meet the 2024
Energy Creates Judges

Our judges, representing diverse disciplines, industries, and backgrounds, generously volunteered their time and operated with complete independence.

Patrick McLaughlin
Filmmaker
Patrick McLaughlin
Nannette Ho-Covernton
Engineer
Nannette Ho-Covernton
Mary MacLean
Canadian Renewable Energy Association
Mary MacLean
Sam Obadero
Photographer
Sam Obadero
Arlene Lai
Creative Consultant
Arlene Lai

Judging Rubric
for Project Submissions

Refer to our Judging Rubric to see how carefully and systematically the scores were calculated.

1. Originality and Creativity (20 points)
Uniqueness of Concept (10 points): How original and innovative is the project idea?
  • 0-2 points: The project shows no originality.
  • 3-5 points: The project shows some originality but has noticeable similarities to existing ideas.
  • 6-8 points: The project is mostly original with some innovative elements.
  • 9-10 points: The project is highly original and innovative, offering a unique perspective.

Creative Approach (10 points): How creatively is the project executed?
  • 0-2 points: The execution is conventional with little creativity.
  • 3-5 points: The execution shows some creativity but lacks originality in key areas.
  • 6-8 points: The execution is creative with a few original elements.
  • 9-10 points: The execution is highly creative and original, demonstrating exceptional innovation.
Line
2. Relevance and Impact (20 points)
Relevance to Theme/Goals (10 points): How well does the project align with the
contest’s theme or goals?
  • 0-2 points: The project is loosely related to the theme or goals.
  • 3-5 points: The project aligns with the theme or goals but not strongly.
  • 6-8 points: The project is relevant and aligns well with the theme or goals.
  • 9-10 points: The project is highly relevant and strongly aligns with the theme or goals.
Potential Impact (10 points): What is the potential impact of the project on its intended audience or field? This can be interpreted as emotional or cognitive impact; the power of the project to ignite critical thinking.
  • 0-2 points: The project is unlikely to have any significant impact.
  • 3-5 points: The project has some potential impact but is limited in scope.
  • 6-8 points: The project has a clear potential impact with a significant reach.
  • 9-10 points: The project has a high potential impact, potentially transforming the field or
    significantly benefiting the audience.
Line
3. Presentation and Clarity (20 points)
Clarity of Presentation (10 points): How clearly is the project presented?
  • 0-2 points: The presentation is unclear and difficult to understand.
  • 3-5 points: The presentation is somewhat clear but has significant gaps.
  • 6-8 points: The presentation is clear with minor areas of confusion.
  • 9-10 points: The presentation is exceptionally clear and easy to understand.
Professionalism (10 points): How professional is the presentation and submission?
  • 0-2 points: The presentation is unprofessional and lacks polish.
  • 3-5 points: The presentation is somewhat professional but lacks polish.
  • 6-8 points: The presentation is professional with minor areas for improvement.
  • 9-10 points: The presentation is highly professional and polished.
Line
4. Technical Merit (20 points)
Technical Skill and Competence (20 points): How well does the project demonstrate
technical skill and competence?
  • 0-4 points: The project shows little to no technical skill.
  • 5-9 points: The project shows some technical skill but has noticeable flaws.
  • 10-14 points: The project demonstrates strong technical skill with minor issues.
  • 15-20 points: The project demonstrates exceptional technical skill and competence.
Line
5. Wildcard Points (20 points)
Judge’s Discretion (20 points)
  • Between 0-20 points awarded at the discretion of the judge.
Line
Total Points: 100

Each criterion should be scored independently, and the total score for each project should
be the sum of the individual criteria scores. This rubric ensures a comprehensive evaluation
of each project's originality, relevance, impact, presentation, and technical merit.